Jump to content

Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice

Just added!
Read more...

Satisfactory

Find a short-term solution for your long-term problems!
Read more...

Golf With Your Friends

Golf with accuracy!
Read more...

Bunker Punks

Sensitivity for this game has to be set in the registry.
Read more...

Quantum League

Added hipfire and zoom sensitivity. Use config file for best accuracy.
Read more...
Ming

R6 to Aimhero 360 distance/monitor distance/viewspeed v1 or v2

Recommended Posts

Hello guys

i just start using this service one day, i wondering which one is a much better option if i want to practice my aim in aimhero

is it the 360 distance/monitor distance/viewspeed v1 or v2

 

im so confused with those options 

please help me!!

763424275_rainbowsixtoAimhero(Acgo).thumb.png.84ff623f4ef99a7c268ec4231eadf735.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

360 distance is only suitable for hipfire to hipfire conversion. The other methods can be used for anything, but which one is "best" is depending on your preference.

An important key is to always try to match the "Actual HFOV" between games so the sensitivity feels the same. This is not always possible however as a lot of games don't have the option to customize the FOV, or the preferred FOV is out of range of the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Ming said:

what does HFOV means?

Horizontal field of view. The FOV you configure in the game vary between games depending on the FOV type they use, but the Actual HFOV is what you actually see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ming said:

Hello guys

i just start using this service one day, i wondering which one is a much better option if i want to practice my aim in aimhero

is it the 360 distance/monitor distance/viewspeed v1 or v2

 

im so confused with those options 

please help me!!

763424275_rainbowsixtoAimhero(Acgo).thumb.png.84ff623f4ef99a7c268ec4231eadf735.png

Converting via 360 distance is most mathematically correct but feels wrong because of changes in perceived size - because you sit at the same distance from your monitor for the entire fov range, you are essentially zooming in and out, but you must compensate by changing 360 distance. This is demonstrated in this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYCrGAJshvQ

Therefore we must use a conversion method to convert sensitivity across the entire range of fov.

It's my opinion that monitor distance matching is the correct method as this syncs your perceived sensitivity as per the gear ratio principle. The only problem with monitor matching is that you can only perfectly match one point on the screen. You will not maintain perfect muscle memory at all points on the screen. This is a natural consequence of rectilinearly projecting 3D onto 2D.

Then you have to ask, which percentage do I use? Well, all monitor match percentages are valid, since they all follow the gear ratio principle, yet all are arbitrary (except 0%). This means that there is no universally acceptable percentage. It's better to understand the range of percentages as having their advantages and disadvantages.

Personally I love 0% because it matches muscle memory where you need it most - at the crosshair. And 0% maintains the same visual angle no matter what setup you use, so it's not as arbitrary as other percentages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...