February 16, 20215 yr Hello. I am happy with my ADS feel on modern warfare. ADS sens is 1 and coefficient is set to 1.87. What would I do to convert the base sens so that my ads will be mathematically the same while being at 0.0 coefficient? Sorry if it's obvious I'm a bit dense. Thanks
February 16, 20215 yr I could be wrong. But if you're games current monitor coefficient settings are at 1.78 and you'd wish to convert it to a 0.0 coefficient, I believe you need to make sure the above settings for ADS Monitor Distance - Vertical and Monitor Distance-Vertical is 178% for both. Which would give you ADS values as 1.0 for which you have MW currently set at. So to find out what ADS sensitivity you need, you'd pretty much change "Sensitivity 2" under Convert To for the 2nd part as 0. Which would pretty much spit out all the ADS values for 0 coefficient setting for MW Below is the ADS settings that should spit out what you'd want to convert the feeling of 1.78 coefficient to 0.0 for the ADS values you'd want
February 16, 20215 yr 7 hours ago, h1tcu said: I could be wrong. But if you're games current monitor coefficient settings are at 1.78 and you'd wish to convert it to a 0.0 coefficient, I believe you need to make sure the above settings for ADS Monitor Distance - Vertical and Monitor Distance-Vertical is 178% for both. Which would give you ADS values as 1.0 for which you have MW currently set at. So to find out what ADS sensitivity you need, you'd pretty much change "Sensitivity 2" under Convert To for the 2nd part as 0. Which would pretty much spit out all the ADS values for 0 coefficient setting for MW Below is the ADS settings that should spit out what you'd want to convert the feeling of 1.78 coefficient to 0.0 for the ADS values you'd want while this is exactly what was asked for it doesnt really full fill anything so i did not initially bother with it just here to point out that 0% works the best if you don't change the in game values from 1.0 point being that the pixel ratio will be the same across all zoom levels (which it wont be if you try to use 178% on a 0% multiplier ) ┬┴┬┴┤(・_├┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┤ ͜ʖ ͡°) ├┬┴┬┴
February 16, 20215 yr Wizard 4 hours ago, fortunate reee said: while this is exactly what was asked for it doesnt really full fill anything Indeed, by doing this you will only get two aims (one low and one high zoom) matched to your previous coefficient, all others will be off. Join the community on Discord!
February 16, 20215 yr I also just realized I was dyslexic and stated 178% and not 187% like the original post stated Also yes. After inputting the request and showing the results. I didn't declare that it would spit out so many varying values. As i'm confident the OP wanted a uniform setting.
February 17, 20215 yr 12 hours ago, h1tcu said: I also just realized I was dyslexic and stated 178% and not 187% like the original post stated Also yes. After inputting the request and showing the results. I didn't declare that it would spit out so many varying values. As i'm confident the OP wanted a uniform setting. 178 mdv makes sense the zoom factor of 1.78 directly translates to 178 in the calculator my initial thing was more directed at the author of the post since the request was a bit nonsensical , your answer is good Edited February 17, 20215 yr by fortunate reee ┬┴┬┴┤(・_├┬┴┬┴┬┴┬┴┤ ͜ʖ ͡°) ├┬┴┬┴
Create an account or sign in to comment