Hi, I've been using Mouse-Sensitivity.com for a while now and have never had a problem. However, with PUBG it feels either too slow or too fast. I tried to use Monitor Distance using CS:GO as a base at 100% monitor match but the 360 Degree rotation is off by about 5-6 inches, which is a huge amount. Am I making a mistake somewhere? 

 

Screenshot of Settings: 

https://gyazo.com/be807cad2e2e917a8273ddf6eab82022

Edited August 11, 20179 yr by Kalum92

Edited January 28, 20188 yr by Drimzi

This is because the FOV's are different. You could match 360 distance instead of Monitor Distance for hipfire, which some might prefer because they find it more important to have the feeling of a 90 or 180 degree turn, than to snap to an object on the monitor (which Monitor Distance is for).

So the settings I have entered should feel the same? Hipfire was just an example, I never use Hipfire when shooting on PUBG. Basically, I'd like my tracking/snapping in PUBG to be as close as possible to CS:GO

Edited August 11, 20179 yr by Kalum92

With different FOVs, Viewspeed is going to be your best option. If you can match, or closely match, the FOV in CSGO (106.26 Horizontal, I believe)360 distance is the best. Matching at 100% feels super unnatural for most long time PC gamers. CSGO and Quake have used 75% matching for about 15 years now. Use ViewSpeed, IMO. Matching your First Person Sensitivity to third-person often doesn't feel as natural, people are used to panning the camera more quickly in the 3rd person view than they do in FPS. 

I get a converted sensitivity of 52 Cm/360 based off my CSGO sens of 41.6CM (this is a medium-low sens). 52 CM/360 should feel perfectly natural if you're used to playing at low sens.

Regardless, it's a 10 CM distance, which isn't very much and should feel fine to you at the lower FOV. I play BF1 at the default FOV with about 52 CM/360 and have no problem turning on people and tracking, you do need to have a nice big mousepad for this style of play though.

 

Edit: You have almost the same sensitivity as me, try about 52 ish CM/360 and see how that feels compared to matching it at 100%.  For a point of reference, matching at 100% is the same as matching at the edges of a 16:9 screen, it is pixel accurate if you are flicking to the edge of your 16:9 (i.e. 1080p) screen, but not very accurate at all in the middle.

Edited August 11, 20179 yr by Bryan Redding