Hey guys.

Let's take Modern Warfare 2019 as example.

When I put on the converter "All" with my 1.33 coefficient, it tries to show me for all zoom levels the true 1:1 sensitvity as the hipfire sens (as far as I understood).

However, I always played on 100%, which I thought would be 1:1 the same sensitivity as my hipfire sensitivity as it just felt right. True 1:1 seems to feel slower, but more right... and now my old settings don't feel as right anymore haha

Putting ADS sens on 100% makes it faster I think, but feels more like 1:1 to Hipfire sens. Somehow. Somehow not. I really don't know anymore. 

My question: What do you guys think is better for improving aim? Having it on 100% (1.0000) or change it to what the converter says is true 1:1?

I just can't decide, so I'm hoping to get some opinions, in best case with experience you made already. Sorry for the bad description, I hope you guys understand what I meant!

Edited October 6, 20214 yr by Minzent

Im recommend 3.56 which is 200% mdh which is equals pixel by pixel between scopes

But u need 1-2 weeks to get used to it, especially high zoom

Most people will say 0% for sure, i tried it for high period but didnt get better at aim trainers 

Edited October 6, 20214 yr by Merinda18

3 hours ago, Minzent said:

1.33 coefficient, it tries to show me for all zoom levels the true 1:1 sensitvity as the hipfire sens (as far as I understood).

you need to ask yourself what your definition of "true 1:1" is

the calc will give you whatever you set up, or what the game you've selected uses by default that shouldnt be interpreted as a recommendation

try all the options for days at a time ( dont go back and forth every 5 mins ) and choose what you like , or choose a "random" / more uncommon number 

1 hour ago, Merinda18 said:

200% mdh

 

so for 0%

or 133 for 1.333

 

in the end its whatever works for you