which viewspeed should i use v1 or v2

[blstermaxx]

i try 2 convert division sens to fortnite sens and i don't know which viewspeed should i use i use 1440x1080 on both game 

[tuphac]

viewspeed 1 is better than 2 but monitor match at 56.25 is even better than viewspeed 1

[blstermaxx]

why 56.25 is better than viewspeed 1 and 2 ?
 

 

[tuphac]

for long term effect like memorization, 56.25% will train your body to memorize and remember hand movement better.     Although i used to use viewspeed1 and got  instant result with it.

viewspeed1 might give you a burst of Godly Aim if you play aim training in one game then try to see if it translate to another. This is good but this Godly aim doesn't last...kinda like a temporary performance enhancement. 

56.25% is like improving at a slower rate like 1% each day. Long term effect, you will be miles ahead of the competition 5 years from now.

Edited July 18, 2018 by tuphac

[Drimzi]

Distance matching results in arbitrary scaling, so I wouldn't say 56.25% is best for muscle memory. It defines a constant radius to aim to the edge of your 1:1 fov, or in other words, you define a constrained operating area for the mouse when aiming within your field of view. You can become very proficient in wrist or finger aiming if that is all that is required for aiming somewhere on the screen.

It is also imo the only screen *distance* match that is somewhat sensible, as 56.25% is the max percentage to match a screen-space distance vertically, any higher and that distance is outside of the screen vertically, and is only going to be on the screen horizontally, which isn't useful as the distance match is only true under all circumstances for pitch, not yaw. The curvature of your aim depends on the pitch, and in extreme cases like looking up or down, the distance to aim at a point outside of the 1:1 fov is not going to match the distance that you defined. Distance is still arbitrary, but this distance is also a nice balance between scaling correctly (0%) and maintaining view speed.

Edited July 18, 2018 by Drimzi

[tuphac]

6 hours ago, Drimzi said:

Distance matching results in arbitrary scaling, so I wouldn't say 56.25% is best for muscle memory. It defines a constant radius to aim to the edge of your 1:1 fov, or in other words, you define a constrained operating area for the mouse when aiming within your field of view. You can become very proficient in wrist or finger aiming if that is all that is required for aiming somewhere on the screen.

It is also imo the only screen *distance* match that is somewhat sensible, as 56.25% is the max percentage to match a screen-space distance vertically, any higher and that distance is outside of the screen vertically, and is only going to be on the screen horizontally, which isn't useful as the distance match is only true under all circumstances for pitch, not yaw. The curvature of your aim depends on the pitch, and in extreme cases like looking up or down, the distance to aim at a point outside of the 1:1 fov is not going to match the distance that you defined. Distance is still arbitrary, but this distance is also a nice balance between scaling correctly (0%) and maintaining view speed.

Nicely said Master Drimzi. I am indeed becoming more and more proficient with my finger and wrist using this method.  

I play on 70.98 CM/360 and 80% of the time its my finger and wrist making slight adjustment to shoot things. Elbow is almost exclusively just for turning around 180.

Edited July 18, 2018 by tuphac

[jz_31@hotmail.fr]

So what's best between the 2 in the end? I'm troubled