RepsakXD

https://twitter.com/BattlefieldComm/status/1600834884930445312?s=20&t=wCtDA3f2QMc71Lqfx2oj6Q

Update: So fiddling some more with some settings seems to have fixed the issue or almost. Idk exactly what helped fix it. Idk if it is just me or some settings I need to change, but I feel like there is some deadzone on the pc mouse feeling, or slow/sluggish movement feel when turning, running around does not feel as smooth and snappy as in warzone. Like they somehow mixed controller and pc inputs.

What about the windows pointer speed? I'm used to 400dpi and around 50cm for a 360(BF4 10% UsA - on. Or Apex legends 2.1) always been using native 1920/1080p, never really felt any issue with it. But I see a lot of people going to 1600 dpi. The issue for me with that is the windows speed/browsing and inventory management become very difficult for me, unless I change to 3 or 4 out of 11 in windows! But how much does it affect raw input? I know most games now a days have raw mouse input options, but some still don´t or at least don´t show it! Like Super People, and steam commands don't seem to work for this game? Come to think of it, the best of both worlds would be to go for 800 dpi and keep windows at 6/11. That seems like something I would have much easier time getting used to, and also often are recommended for 1920/1080p.

It is such a bad quality control from DICE, if you ask me! Not to have basic settings/controls working correctly and smooth from launch! I don't get why they just didn't copy pasted settings from recent BF games, when that works just fine in those!? Its like one of the most important aspect of a game, prober working controls!!!

Yeah the hip fire is confusing me a little. Like I'm used to have it set to 10% ever since BF4. And FoV description don't seem to show what Horizontal number it is at, when changing the vertical FoV, like it did in previous BF. At least not from the menu settings I have seen today.

...

Are some of the values/numbers, descriptions still different from BF4/BF1/BF5??? If so I do not understand why they just didn't copy pasted, since it works just fine from previous titles!

Even though 0% Is the most mathematically sound, as I understand it. I would say use whatever works for you! Like for me when I play Battlefield I use coefficient at default 133%. I have been used to It for years now, and for Apex as I understand it, is based on 0%. I just played the game and got used to how It is In Apex.

Yup it baffles me why they change something that worked just fine in BF4 and BF1. I dunno about BFV? I sure hope it will be different/back to normal when the full game comes out. But right now my hopes I NOT high for BF2042, Idk if it is just me, but it feels more Hardline/CoD ish than BF4/BF3.

I just tried BF2042 a little, veil on the surface the settings options looks similar to previous BF the default numbers are so different, and it feels different to like BF4 and BF1. So far it is confusing me, and I don't like it. And the performance don't seem good so far.

I normally just calculate using hipfire. and simple mode. My setting is to just match my hipfire, with it being around 50cm for a 360. So for me that is 7.0 sens on 90 FoV 400dpi . And it feels about right for me, and also adds up when using a ruler to double tjek. So I would guess yours would be like somewhere in the range of 6.65- 7.0.

My guess would be 0.100 to get it the same as before. Mine was 0.08 before, and after the new patch 0.079( very little change)I just changed it to 0.080 feels like the exact same as before. I double checked it with the calculator. And I use the Hipfire option, under the aim tab.

Anyone know of a good user.cfg for better performance?

Em someone just delete/disregard this post.

I would say this is mostly a preference, you get benefits/negatives with both high/vs low( but 90-100 to me is more like a middle FoV) You see more with high FoV, but targets will generally be a lot smaller. To me 90 FoV is a good balanced FoV.