Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III (2023) / Modern Warfare II (2022) / Warzone 2.0

Dear colleagues |
please help . 
I need create the same sensitivity for Call of Duty WZ 2 ( SMG )  from APEX x2  :

Is there any downside to using 1.33 coefficient in MWII compared to 0? My aim has never felt better in any game so far and I forgot to set it to 0. Is it less accurate than 0 and monitor distance horizontal? Or will it cause me a lot of grief trying to convert to other games?

I would like to optimize my settings as my aim BLOWS. I joined this site as subscriber but am confused as to what steps I should take first.

I'm using MouseMonitorDistanceCoeff 0 for the game, but some optics have inaccurate sensitivity. For example, SZ SRO-7 has the same sensitivity as other 1x scopes but has extra zoom.

This situation is more common among sniper scopes. The image below shows three different optics with visually the same zoom. The description of magnification in the game is inaccurate. After testing, I found that A and B have the same sensitivity, and C is lower than them. I noticed that C has a higher zoom than A and B out of the optic frame. Not sure how dual render affects the calculation of sensitivity in the game. I‘d like to know which optics can provide a consistent MDH 0% experience.

A. SP-X 80 6.6x (11.0x toggle)

B. FTac Locus SP (11.5x toggle)

C. SZ Ultra 11.5x

Another example:

They have the same description,  sensitivity, and outer zoom but different inner zoom. E has a higher magnification actually.

D. FJX Imperium 12x

E. Luca Field-6 (12x toggle)

Am 14.4.2023 um 01:02 schrieb Journalist:

Another example:

They have the same description,  sensitivity, and outer zoom but different inner zoom. E has a higher magnification actually.

D. FJX Imperium 12x

E. Luca Field-6 (12x toggle)

They have different (maybe only inner zoom) FoV. So aiming may feel different between these two.

Both are listed as 12x, but the Luca has +13° FoV, compared to the base 12x FJX Imperium scope. You can check all scopes on sym.gg (MW2 gunsmith) and compare their FoV. The stats are all data-mined and should be 100% correct.

Just select the weapon of choice and go through the optics dropdown menu. Mouseover will show you the FoV changes with every optic, compared to the base weapon optic.

Am 14.4.2023 um 01:07 schrieb DPI Wizard:

What a mess... I'll look into this when I got some time!

That would be amazing. How I said above, you can see all stats on sym.gg - so you know exactly the FoV degree changes for every optic.

On 4/28/2023 at 9:27 AM, r3d84 said:

Both are listed as 12x, but the Luca has +13° FoV, compared to the base 12x FJX Imperium scope. You can check all scopes on sym.gg (MW2 gunsmith) and compare their FoV. The stats are all data-mined and should be 100% correct.

but Sym.gg doesn't show the toggle zoom option for the optics that can zoom in.

The Dual Render scope FoV difference is what I've been trying to explain to you guys. We have to take into account for Affect FoV change too as the scope change would be different because of the "base zoom (outside scope)" change.

So... how do we calculate the FoV within the scope (optics)?

Hello - is anyone experiencing that the same mouse sensitivity that is imported from MW2 feels much faster in the MW3 beta? 

@DPI Wizard IN MW3 which legacy does it default to? BO or MW legacy ADS?

Wanted to know if it was just me, but has anyone noticed any weird-ness with the mouse feel in MWIII? There's a new command in the config (options.3.cod23.cst) called "MouseUsesRawInput" defaulted to 'true'. This command wasn't in MWII (2022) and was just wondering if there's any packet loss, negative acceleration, etc whether this is set to True or False.

4 minutes ago, DPI Wizard said:

If you set it to false, Windows will intercept all packets from the mouse and process them. This adds both lag and and potential acceleration due to the pointer speed setting (WPS) in Windows, as well as acceleration due to "Enhance pointer precision".

Note that exactly how this works depends on the game. Rainbow 6 had an issue previously that made "Raw Input" set to "Off" way more accurate than having it on. But in pretty much all cases it's recommended to have it on to get the raw data from the mouse for maximum precision.

Yeah, I assumed it would be worse when setting RawInput to false, but it wasn't really. I even raised my Windows pointer speed all the way to 11 then launched MW3 beta with Raw input disabled but it didn't affect my in-game sens. My 360 distance was still the same. It seems like the engine is still using some kind of "raw input" so I'm not sure what that setting is changing.

Funny you mention R6 Siege because I remember testing that game a while back with Windows pointer speed as well (raw on vs off). It's the same situation there; raw off still takes data directly from the mouse so it's confusing what to trust.

My settings on MWII can't be replicated in the calculator for conversion. I use a 1.78 coefficient with a 0.81x on ads on relative ads, but i can't input the 0.81 on the calculator, so i can't replicate these settings across games. This particular combination of settings doesn't seem possible to input.

19 minutes ago, Feedingwolves said:

My settings on MWII can't be replicated in the calculator for conversion. I use a 1.78 coefficient with a 0.81x on ads on relative ads, but i can't input the 0.81 on the calculator, so i can't replicate these settings across games. This particular combination of settings doesn't seem possible to input.

https://www.mouse-sensitivity.com/?share=59d6d9a1b37456c3bdc83b5d8dcbd9b4

Does what im aiming for lose its purpose if im using viewspeed conversion? In retrospect this feels like a stupid question.