Jump to content

Oh Deer

The sensitivity slider is not accurate, expect some discrepancy. Use the config file for best accuracy.
Read more...

Fractal Block World

The sensitivity slider is not accurate, expect some discrepancy. Use the config file for best accuracy.
Read more...

Outpath

The sensitivity slider is not accurate, expect some discrepancy.
Read more...

Red Dead Redemption

All aims use the same sensitivity setting, choose the sensitivity for the aim you prefer to be matched.
Read more...

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II - The Sith Lords

Just added!
Read more...

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War


Recommended Posts

  • Wizard
31 minutes ago, KeyMoneybateS said:

Are we going to be getting detailed FOV and sensitivity for gun types like for Modern Warfare 2019? Not really helpful when all the low zooms are grouped together.

Yes, but it's a bit hard to do properly until they open up for custom servers.

Link to comment

I saw people talking about bad input in reddit but I tried beta today and input feels pretty well on 1.78 coef.

 

EDIT: BUG REPORT! There is 1 COD BO cold war option in calculator, plus 2 MW2019. One of the MW2019 actually cold war.

 

bug.png

Edited by Pyroxia
BUG REPORT
Link to comment
  • Wizard
11 hours ago, Pyroxia said:

EDIT: BUG REPORT! There is 1 COD BO cold war option in calculator, plus 2 MW2019. One of the MW2019 actually cold war.

Thanks, fixed!

1 hour ago, BabyBearBk said:

Is 0 coeff broken on Cold War too?

Seems to work correctly from what I've tested so far.

Link to comment
Quote

When using legacy and increasing fov from 80->100 the ADS sensitivity slows down dramatically but hip fire feels fine, is there any calculation for this?

Don't use legacy

 

Edited by KODa
Link to comment
18 minutes ago, KODa said:

Don't use legacy

 

I only use legacy because the feel similar to cod4 and Apex etc. I want my sensitivity to scale with the zoom similar to older titles not artificially implemented monitor distance 1:1 regardless of the sight/zoom. the new way doesn’t feel right after years of muscle memory. It is perfect at 80 fov but that’s too low unfortunately and hard to try mess around with in public matches to get it right by changing zoom sens etc 

Link to comment
27 minutes ago, mitti said:

I only use legacy because the feel similar to cod4 and Apex etc. I want my sensitivity to scale with the zoom similar to older titles not artificially implemented monitor distance 1:1 regardless of the sight/zoom. the new way doesn’t feel right after years of muscle memory. It is perfect at 80 fov but that’s too low unfortunately and hard to try mess around with in public matches to get it right by changing zoom sens etc 

Is your ads field of view on "independent" or "affected"?

Independent on legacy/zoom ratio/0% would definitely make the ads feel uncomfortably slow due to it zooming in so much compared to the higher hipfire fov. Other than that I don't know, I thought the mouse input felt pretty much the same as MW2019, not that I really played that all that much but oh well.

Link to comment
45 minutes ago, mitti said:

I only use legacy because the feel similar to cod4 and Apex etc. I want my sensitivity to scale with the zoom similar to older titles not artificially implemented monitor distance 1:1 regardless of the sight/zoom. the new way doesn’t feel right after years of muscle memory. It is perfect at 80 fov but that’s too low unfortunately and hard to try mess around with in public matches to get it right by changing zoom sens etc 

Then you should use relative with coefficient 0.0, this is the same method (0% MM) as Apex and older CODs. Legacy is supposed to do this too, but has issues with different FOVs, I believe MW had this issue too until it was patched. (but I am sure @DPI Wizard can provide more detail)

Normally, the scaling when using relative should work with either independent or affected ADS FOV.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Wiet Pot said:

Then you should use relative with coefficient 0.0, this is the same method (0% MM) as Apex and older CODs. Legacy is supposed to do this too, but has issues with different FOVs, I believe MW had this issue too until it was patched. (but I am sure @DPI Wizard can provide more detail)

Normally, the scaling when using relative should work with either independent or affected ADS FOV.

Legacy seems to work fine on 80 fov and feels the same as the older titles, however the problem is when you increase your fov ie 80 to 105 the hipfire sens is the same, but the ads becomes dramatically slower which is very annoying. I will try coefficient 0 and report back although if it does the same as legacy I suppose I’ll be stuck on the low fov for a while longer 

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, DPI Wizard said:

They have changed things a bit compared to MW indeed. Legacy now seem to be locked to 80 hdeg 16:9 FOV instead of 65 hdeg 4:3, and it might scale differently with FOV. Still working on it, but it's very time consuming without a custom server.

Aren't 80 hdeg 16:9 FOV and 65 hdeg 4:3 the same, both 51 vdeg FOV?

Link to comment
  • Wizard
Just now, octiceps said:

Aren't 80 hdeg 16:9 FOV and 65 hdeg 4:3 the same, both 51 vdeg FOV?

80 in 16:9 is 64.366444 in 4:3, which makes a slight difference in MW when comparing Legacy and Relative coeff 0 at FOV 80.

It doesn't seem to be the case in Cold War, but MW was actually like this at a stage too, and then got reverted back to using 65 4:3 for legacy.

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...

yeah i noticed that too that something is off with legacy

 

the community manager asked around and got told that the legacy between infinty ward old games and treyarch old games is different

using relative gets around it but would still be cool to get a closer look at legacy

 

Edited by Nickich
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...